<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TechEd 2008 notes: Why Software Sucks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/</link>
	<description>Life, .NET, and Cats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:53:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Software Sucks &#124; keyongtech</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-41508</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Software Sucks &#124; keyongtech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/?p=2540#comment-41508</guid>
		<description>[...] Software Sucks     Great blog entry by Joe White (notes from a TechEd presentation): http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/...oftware-sucks/  Rick Carter carterrk Chair, Delphi/Paradox SIG, Cincinnati PC Users Group  --- posted by geoForum [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Software Sucks     Great blog entry by Joe White (notes from a TechEd presentation): <a href="http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/...oftware-sucks/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/&#8230;oftware-sucks/</a>  Rick Carter carterrk Chair, Delphi/Paradox SIG, Cincinnati PC Users Group  &#8212; posted by geoForum [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Link Post 45 &#171; Rhonda Tipton&#8217;s WebLog</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-21053</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Link Post 45 &#171; Rhonda Tipton&#8217;s WebLog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:26:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/?p=2540#comment-21053</guid>
		<description>[...] White has posted very detailed notes from TechEd 2008:&#160; #1 ~ #2 ~ #3 ~ #4 ~ #5 ~ #6 ~ #7 ~ #8 ~ #9 ~ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] White has posted very detailed notes from TechEd 2008:&nbsp; #1 ~ #2 ~ #3 ~ #4 ~ #5 ~ #6 ~ #7 ~ #8 ~ #9 ~ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-20573</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 12:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/?p=2540#comment-20573</guid>
		<description>This really needed saying! Great article! Microsoft, Adobe and Symantec really need to understand :- 

&quot;Users don’t want to use your programs. They want to HAVE USED your programs. They want the benefit, not the process.&quot;

I wrote an article about how some later versions of popular software get worse as time marches on and new versions are churned out for the sake of &quot;keeping up with the Jones&#039;s&quot;. It is at http://www.jacobsm.com/techgripe.htm under the title &quot;Why does software seem to get worse as time goes on?&quot; Enjoy and keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This really needed saying! Great article! Microsoft, Adobe and Symantec really need to understand :- </p>
<p>&#8220;Users don’t want to use your programs. They want to HAVE USED your programs. They want the benefit, not the process.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wrote an article about how some later versions of popular software get worse as time marches on and new versions are churned out for the sake of &#8220;keeping up with the Jones&#8217;s&#8221;. It is at <a href="http://www.jacobsm.com/techgripe.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.jacobsm.com/techgripe.htm</a> under the title &#8220;Why does software seem to get worse as time goes on?&#8221; Enjoy and keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Halgren</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-20339</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Halgren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/?p=2540#comment-20339</guid>
		<description>The big problem is that many of the coders are in their 20s and have no respect for anything that is not the latest and greatest.  The attitude seems to be &quot;Our software is so cool you should be glad to be using it&quot; regardless of how much of our time is wasted, or how user hostile the interface has become.  I have a list of dozens of ways earlier versions were superior to current versions in ease of use, and entire books have been written about Windows Annoyances.  Why does Word have an &quot;anti-Caps-Lock&quot; feature (nO oNE wOULD eVER wANT tHEIR pROSE tO lOOK lIKE tHIS) and the OS does not?  Clearly they can fix the problem, and why should I ever have to remember to save my work?  Auto save has always been possible, but only one COTS product (HyperCard) ever had it.  Some apps have periodic save features, but I want it all saved.  

Why does Word still honor the MDI paradigm, but ignore the Ctrl-Tab shortcut key, which is a Windows standard(What idiot thinks Ctrl-F6 is better?)?  Why does Excel break that paradigm, launching a new window which adds another item to the Alt-Tab list?  In later versions of browsers, one can choose whether to add a tab or a window.  This kind of choice shows respect for the user.  If you make cool new innovations, let me choose whether I prefer the new way or the one to which I&#039;m accustomed.  Don&#039;t ram your &quot;brilliant&quot; ideas down my throat.

Why did File Manager (Windows 3.1) have a highlight across the entire list, and Windows Explorer doesn&#039;t?  Again, this is a feature available in Word, but not in the OS.  Why did Paint, starting with XP, come with the printing defaults set to center the image in a two page printout?  Since the keyboard shortcut keys to change this deranged default are: &quot;Alt,F,U&quot; I conclude the developers are giving us the bird in a passive-aggressive way.  Why do my color printers require that I change the settings to print in only black and white EVERY TIME I use them?  Seems to me they are trying to waste my printer ink money.  That should be illegal, since it is petty theft of at least my time.

If Microsoft made autos, they would cost a few thousand dollars and get 300 mpg, but some mornings you would be unable to insert your ignition key in the usual place.  A search would find it bolted to the spare tire, and you would have to pull out your tools and reinstall it on the dashboard.  Even after you get going, say on a vacation drive, you better be careful how you turn off the motor when you stop for lunch or you&#039;ll find yourself back at home with the first three hours driving wasted.

As an old friend calls this, &quot;The triumph of marketing over engineering.&quot;  Microsoft is as arrogant as GM (who never even had a market research department until 1985!) and I for one was glad to see the EU stand up to them.  If they played with respect for their rivals and their users, they might have spent those billions of dollars (which the EU fined them) on usability studies and testing, giving us a better toolset.  I accept that they are a profit making enterprise, and I have no problem paying for tools I use.  I just resent being forced into their beta testing department with no compensation.

Along with adding a virgin I would confiscate all the developers&#039; mice during their unit testing, forcing them to use only keyboard shortcuts, and give them all glasses which simulate middle aged vision.  Then the larger font settings would work, finally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big problem is that many of the coders are in their 20s and have no respect for anything that is not the latest and greatest.  The attitude seems to be &#8220;Our software is so cool you should be glad to be using it&#8221; regardless of how much of our time is wasted, or how user hostile the interface has become.  I have a list of dozens of ways earlier versions were superior to current versions in ease of use, and entire books have been written about Windows Annoyances.  Why does Word have an &#8220;anti-Caps-Lock&#8221; feature (nO oNE wOULD eVER wANT tHEIR pROSE tO lOOK lIKE tHIS) and the OS does not?  Clearly they can fix the problem, and why should I ever have to remember to save my work?  Auto save has always been possible, but only one COTS product (HyperCard) ever had it.  Some apps have periodic save features, but I want it all saved.  </p>
<p>Why does Word still honor the MDI paradigm, but ignore the Ctrl-Tab shortcut key, which is a Windows standard(What idiot thinks Ctrl-F6 is better?)?  Why does Excel break that paradigm, launching a new window which adds another item to the Alt-Tab list?  In later versions of browsers, one can choose whether to add a tab or a window.  This kind of choice shows respect for the user.  If you make cool new innovations, let me choose whether I prefer the new way or the one to which I&#8217;m accustomed.  Don&#8217;t ram your &#8220;brilliant&#8221; ideas down my throat.</p>
<p>Why did File Manager (Windows 3.1) have a highlight across the entire list, and Windows Explorer doesn&#8217;t?  Again, this is a feature available in Word, but not in the OS.  Why did Paint, starting with XP, come with the printing defaults set to center the image in a two page printout?  Since the keyboard shortcut keys to change this deranged default are: &#8220;Alt,F,U&#8221; I conclude the developers are giving us the bird in a passive-aggressive way.  Why do my color printers require that I change the settings to print in only black and white EVERY TIME I use them?  Seems to me they are trying to waste my printer ink money.  That should be illegal, since it is petty theft of at least my time.</p>
<p>If Microsoft made autos, they would cost a few thousand dollars and get 300 mpg, but some mornings you would be unable to insert your ignition key in the usual place.  A search would find it bolted to the spare tire, and you would have to pull out your tools and reinstall it on the dashboard.  Even after you get going, say on a vacation drive, you better be careful how you turn off the motor when you stop for lunch or you&#8217;ll find yourself back at home with the first three hours driving wasted.</p>
<p>As an old friend calls this, &#8220;The triumph of marketing over engineering.&#8221;  Microsoft is as arrogant as GM (who never even had a market research department until 1985!) and I for one was glad to see the EU stand up to them.  If they played with respect for their rivals and their users, they might have spent those billions of dollars (which the EU fined them) on usability studies and testing, giving us a better toolset.  I accept that they are a profit making enterprise, and I have no problem paying for tools I use.  I just resent being forced into their beta testing department with no compensation.</p>
<p>Along with adding a virgin I would confiscate all the developers&#8217; mice during their unit testing, forcing them to use only keyboard shortcuts, and give them all glasses which simulate middle aged vision.  Then the larger font settings would work, finally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xepol</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-20131</link>
		<dc:creator>Xepol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 14:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/?p=2540#comment-20131</guid>
		<description>If programs &quot;just worked&quot;, users would be obsolete.  Which would be fine, since they tend to be source of most of the errors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If programs &#8220;just worked&#8221;, users would be obsolete.  Which would be fine, since they tend to be source of most of the errors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yogi Yang</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2008/06/03/teched-2008-notes-why-software-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-20031</link>
		<dc:creator>Yogi Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/?p=2540#comment-20031</guid>
		<description>A beautiful and mind opening Article.

Publish more of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A beautiful and mind opening Article.</p>
<p>Publish more of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
