<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Software &#8220;Assurance&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.excastle.com/2007/09/14/software-assurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2007/09/14/software-assurance/</link>
	<description>Life, .NET, and Cats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 08:26:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe White&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What does it mean when CodeGear &#8220;announces&#8221; Delphi 2009?</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2007/09/14/software-assurance/comment-page-1/#comment-28285</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What does it mean when CodeGear &#8220;announces&#8221; Delphi 2009?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 02:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2007/09/14/software-assurance/#comment-28285</guid>
		<description>[...] They&#8217;re not announcing what the product will be; they&#8217;ve already done that. Sure, they&#8217;re filling in a few details, but you can&#8217;t really announce something that everybody already knows about. (Mind you, I&#8217;m not complaining about the early blogging &#8212; I love transparency. But it doesn&#8217;t leave much for the marketing droids to, you know, announce.)  And they&#8217;re not announcing that the product is feature-complete, or ready to ship, or anything. It isn&#8217;t yet. They&#8217;re only  taking pre-orders. No mention is made of when electronic downloads will begin&#8230; or of how much longer after that it&#8217;s going to take before they start shipping physical product&#8230; or of how much longer after that it&#8217;s going to take for customers to start actually getting their co.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] They&#8217;re not announcing what the product will be; they&#8217;ve already done that. Sure, they&#8217;re filling in a few details, but you can&#8217;t really announce something that everybody already knows about. (Mind you, I&#8217;m not complaining about the early blogging &#8212; I love transparency. But it doesn&#8217;t leave much for the marketing droids to, you know, announce.)  And they&#8217;re not announcing that the product is feature-complete, or ready to ship, or anything. It isn&#8217;t yet. They&#8217;re only  taking pre-orders. No mention is made of when electronic downloads will begin&#8230; or of how much longer after that it&#8217;s going to take before they start shipping physical product&#8230; or of how much longer after that it&#8217;s going to take for customers to start actually getting their co&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce McGee</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2007/09/14/software-assurance/comment-page-1/#comment-5705</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2007/09/14/software-assurance/#comment-5705</guid>
		<description>As you say, they are improving, but I have to agree with you.  In my opinion, the minute the install for a new release is available online, SA subscribers should be getting e-mails.&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say, they are improving, but I have to agree with you.  In my opinion, the minute the install for a new release is available online, SA subscribers should be getting e-mails.<br /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
