Believe it or not, Borland actually got around to shipping our copies of Delphi 2006. (What an idea.) We got them today, only about a month and a half after everyone else. Boy, I tell ya, that Software Assurance is one heck of a deal.
Archive for January, 2006
One of the things Dave does on his show is to have people call in and, on the air, cut up or otherwise destroy their credit cards. Creative means of destruction are encouraged, but anything will do: scissors, shredders, firearms, whatever.
Some friends recently loaned us the first season of MacGyver on DVD, and I think MacGyver set a new standard when he used his Swiss army knife to slice up a credit card to jam a traffic light so he could get out of the country.
My kind of guy.
On my desktop machine at home, I run as a non-admin user almost all the time. (Microsoft has started calling this “LUA”, which I always have to look up. For my future reference, it means Limited User Account.) However, I haven’t gotten around to setting up my new laptop that way yet, partly because it’s such a frickin’ pain. There are way too many clueless installers that refuse to install for all users, and way too many Control Panel applets that just don’t work when you’re a non-admin, and other headaches too numerous to mention.
But I think I’m about to switch my laptop to run LUA, because I just ran across a sweet-looking tool called MakeMeAdmin, by Aaron Margosis. It gives you a command prompt that’s running under your current login account, but with administrator rights. So when you run that brain-damaged installer, it will still install under your own account. (His original post on MakeMeAdmin explains how it works. Fun little technicality.)
Note: If you’re running Windows XP, be sure to read the part of this post labeled “For Windows XP Professional” or “For Windows XP Home Edition”. Otherwise, you’ll end up with program directories that are writable even when you aren’t running under MakeMeAdmin, which defeats the whole point. (Not an issue on Windows 2000.)
This is just one of a whole group of posts Aaron wrote on how to run Windows as a non-admin. He has articles that explain both the why and the how. Check it out.
(Footnote: Microsoft has an article explaining how to run Visual Studio .NET 2003 as a non-admin.)
I spent some time today looking at .NET code-coverage tools. (We already know that Microsoft’s code-coverage tools are a waste of time.) Here’s what I dug up.
There are two open-source projects called NCover, and they have nothing to do with each other. One is hosted on SourceForge, the other at NCover.org.
ncover.sourceforge.net apparently works by instrumenting your source files. You have to run ncover-console on your source code; then you add NCover.dll to your project references, and recompile; then you run your unit tests; then you run nrecover to remove all the extra instrumentation code and put your source code back to its original state. Its output appears to be HTML-based, and looks decently readable, though fraught with typos.
ncover.org (which I think is the one that used to be on GotDotNet) works by using the .NET profiling API. You don’t have to modify your code; you just point NCover at your compiled assemblies (you also need PDBs for any assemblies you want it to instrument), and it does some profiling voodoo to instrument your code as it runs. Its output is XML, so it wouldn’t be too hard to write other tools that read it back in, and it comes with an XSL stylesheet that makes the output all pretty and collapsible (alas, the prettiness is only pretty in Internet Explorer, but it’s still kinda nifty).
I prefer having a tool that uses the profiling API, instead of modifying my source code, so I downloaded the NCover from ncover.org. It has an installer, but it doesn’t create any Start Menu icons; it just drops files into Program Files\NCover, and you have to specify the path when you run it. The only thing you need to watch out for is that you need two slashes on the command-line arguments to NCover itself (anything without two slashes is passed through as a command-line parameter to the app being profiled).
I didn’t have any unit tests set up yet (well, I did, but they weren’t usable), so I just ran NCover on my main executable:
"\program files\ncover\ncover.console" //a Budgeter.Classes Budgeter\bin\debug\budgeter.exe
It printed some debug output in the console window, and then my app started up. I clicked a few things, closed the app, and NCover generated its report (this is the NCover output from my little spare-time app).
It’s that simple: you run it, and it just works. And it generates useful output, and it isn’t nailed to the IDE. My kind of tool. Score yet another point for open-source.
Next up: figuring out which unit-testing framework to use…
We did manage to trade in our Visual Studio Architect licenses, and get Developer instead. So I sat down to play with the unit-testing tools.
Verdict? The unit-testing support in Visual Studio 2005 is a toy. Nothing more.
Why do I say that? Because they let you write unit tests, but they don’t let you run them.
The unit-testing support is all part of Visual Studio, not of the .NET Framework itself. So that means you can only run your tests inside the Visual Studio IDE. Meaning, you can’t run your tests from the command line. Or as part of an automated build; there’s no way to tie the tests into MSBuild or Ant or NAnt or anything else. If you want to know that your latest official build actually passes all the tests, you have to open up Visual Studio so you can run the tests manually.
Correction: Apparently there’s a command-line tool called MSTask that lets you run the tests, so apparently you can run the tests from an automated build. Doesn’t help with running the tests as you develop in the IDE, though.
And you have to select the tests manually. There is no way to tell the IDE, “Run all the tests.” Oh, you can select a test from a list, and then click a toolbar button to run it. You can even Shift+click and Ctrl+click to select multiple tests, and then click the toolbar button to run them. But if you want to run all the tests, you have to manually select them all in the list. When you write a new test, you have to manually select it, too. And it doesn’t remember your selections the next time you start Visual Studio.
Don’t we use computers because they let us automate things? Just wondering.
You could, alternatively, hit Ctrl+Shift+X, which runs all the tests in the current assembly. But that only works if the code editor is currently on a test file. Meaning, you can write your test, and hit Ctrl+Shift+X to watch it fail; but then when you go edit your production code to make the test pass, and hit Ctrl+Shift+X again, it does nothing. Why, after all, would you want to run a test you’re not editing?
Why, indeed. Good God, what the hell is wrong with these people?
The most fundamental operation for unit tests is running all the tests. That’s the point. Yes, it can be useful to run a subset of the tests, but that’s a feature you add later. The first thing you write in any testing framework is “Run All Tests”. Because it’s something you do dozens of times a day. You do it all the time, because every time you change your code, you want to know you didn’t just break something. If you’re only running a single test after each change, and you get to the end of the day and find out you broke some other test, you have no idea when you broke it. Which is why you don’t run a single test. You run all the tests, unless you have a really good reason not to.
They just don’t get it. They give you tools for writing everything but unit tests. They give you tools for writing database tests, and ASP.NET server tests. And sure, you don’t want to run those dozens of times a day, because they’re slow, and you’d never get anything done. But unit tests are fast. Any unit test worthy of the name is only going to test your code — not the database, not the server, ideally not even the filesystem. A unit test takes maybe a few microseconds to run. You can run thousands of them at a time, dozens of times a day. It can be a lot of work finding a way to test your code without using the database, but it’s usually worth it, because it gives you the chance to run the test All. The. Time.
Unless, of course, you’re using Microsoft tools.
It’s ridiculous. Team System comes with this fancy new version-control system, when you can get a fabulous tool like Subversion for free. It comes with something Microsoft Marketing claims is a unit-testing tool, but it turns out we’re better off sticking with csUnit.
Team System is just looking more and more like a complete waste. Score another point for open source.
So all the developers on our team recently got copies of Visual Studio 2005. (Year-end and leftover budget: two great things that go great together.)
The question came up of which edition to get: Architect, Developer, or Tester. The person on our end said, “Get Tester for all the QA people, and Architect for all the developers.” Sounded reasonable to me: in every development environment I’ve ever used, Architect is the edition with all the goodies.
Well, apparently not so with Microsoft these days, as I found when I tried to write some unit tests, using the new unit-testing framework that’s supposed to ship as part of Visual Studio 2005’s Team System thingy, and then did some research to find out why I couldn’t.
Apparently, Microsoft has decided that architects don’t write code. Oh heavens no. Architects don’t need tools for unit testing, or profiling, or code coverage, or static analysis. Apparently, architects just bring the specs down from the mountain, and then goof off until the next release.
In my world, the term “architect” does not mean “doesn’t sully their hands with code”. I can sorta see an architect not needing profiling and code coverage, if they’re on a team of, say, five hundred or more. But an architect would still need unit testing tools because the tests are part of the spec. The spec isn’t complete without acceptance tests that say, “The feature isn’t done until this test passes.”
Complete specs, it appears, are not a concern at Microsoft.
Sox is sick, Jennie lost her job, and we’re getting sued.
By the end of this week, I was really starting to stress about the money thing. We haven’t revised the budget since Jennie lost her job earlier in the week, but I had assured her it was okay, we had the emergency fund to cover things like this. But yesterday, after I found out we were getting sued for two thousand some-odd dollars (let this be a lesson: never, never, never, never co-sign someone’s apartment lease), I was starting to freak out.
And then last night it hit me: my priorities were backwards again. Here we are, planning to pay off one of our debts this month, and at the same time, we’re pulling money out of our emergency fund to pay for doctor bills and lost income and vet bills and court costs.
And once I realized that’s what we were doing, I couldn’t help but see how stupid it was. No matter how annoying these collections people may be, they are not a necessity of life. They can wait. We have to take care of us first. We’ll keep making our little payments to them, and we’ll pay them off when we can, but alas, they’ll have to keep paying someone to annoy us for a while yet.
So, we’re going to adjust our budget for the loss of Jennie’s income, we’re going to pay Sox’s vet bill, and we’re already dealing with the lawsuit thing as best we can for now. The annoying creditor won’t get paid off this month, but our emergency fund will continue to be funded, which sounds like a really good idea when there’s a lawsuit hanging over our heads.
I’m not totally over my panic yet, but it’s getting a lot better since I got my priorities straightened out. It’ll get better yet when we actually sit down and revise the budget, and I can see all the numbers, and prove to myself that it’ll be okay.
But first, I’ve got a sick cat to take to the vet.
Brian tells the legend of the Impala-eating rabbit.
One of the latest is “How to Develop Your Personal Elevator Pitch“. They don’t explain what they mean by “elevator pitch”, but I’ve heard the term before (though I heard it called “elevator speech”). One of my former bosses had started three different companies, and was pretty good at getting investor money, so he was well-versed in elevator speaking.
The idea is, you’ve just gotten onto an elevator with someone, and they say, “So, what do you do?” Your time limit: you have until the elevator stops. You’re not giving your life story, you’re just trying to get their interest so you can have them remember you, and give them a business card. You seldom give an elevator speech in an actual elevator, but the name gives the flavor of it: it’s a speech for any situation (and they are legion) where you have a very limited time to get to the point and get the other person’s interest.
The eHow elevator-pitch article isn’t about elevator speeches in general (though it has some good tips). It’s specifically targeted to job interviews, and having a prepared answer to the interview question, “Tell me about yourself.” If you’re on a job search, this article is definitely worth a read.
We had a good Christmas.
It was good to see family (including cats), and of course there was lots of good food. There was also a load of loot. Serious loot. I mean, we’re talking 116-piece drill-bit set kind of loot. Massaging foot spa kind of loot. Forty-nine-piece food-container system with interchangeable lids on a spinning carousel as seen on TV kind of loot. And, of course, the big Christmas check from Mom and Dad (which, to our happy surprise, was much bigger than even in years past).
Not just that, but I had also been doing an evenings-and-weekends project at work with a couple of other developers. We finished that up just before Jennie and I left to go visit family. Between the bonus I got for that project, and the Christmas check from my parents, we had a little less than half a month’s extra salary lying around (!).
Of course that money went into the budget; we weren’t about to have it disappear and wonder where it went! That doesn’t mean we couldn’t have any fun with it, mind you; in fact, we added a “Toys” category to the budget this month. I bought a used laptop from work at a pretty good price (and it’s running pretty well for only having 256 MB of memory), and we picked up a digital camera on clearance.
But the bulk of that money is going to pay off another creditor, and that will be money well spent. Per the Financial Peace plan, we’re punting the lowest balance first. As an added bonus, they’re the ones that have been the biggest pains in the ass (sending our checks back because they “don’t take partial payments” and then calling to chew us out for not paying; it’s actually rather amusing). There are only two disappointments: one, that they might think their harassment tactics actually worked; and two, we won’t get to make fun of them anymore. Ah well. I think we’ll live, on both counts.
So the money thing is definitely going well. We’ll even be able to fully replenish our emergency fund (which we raided last month to fix the car’s radiator — I think this is the first time we’ve ever had a car crisis without a money crisis to go with it!) But the family thing was also great, the food was great, the gift-giving was great, the Christmas Eve church service where we sang “Silent Night” by candlelight was great, the time to read books and play Playstation was great, even the Trivial Pursuit was pretty good. Good downtime, good time.
I’m not sure I’m ready to go back to work yet, but I’d better be, since I’ve already been back for four work days. But it’s definitely been a great Christmas.
Now we just need to find time to take our tree down…