<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Together in Delphi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.excastle.com/2005/11/08/using-together-in-delphi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2005/11/08/using-together-in-delphi/</link>
	<description>Life, .NET, and Cats</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 18:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2005/11/08/using-together-in-delphi/#comment-5433</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2005/11/08/using-together-in-delphi/#comment-5433</guid>
		<description>The form designer is live. When I drop a component onto the designer, the declaration appears in the code right away. Why should Together be any different?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The form designer is live. When I drop a component onto the designer, the declaration appears in the code right away. Why should Together be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad White</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2005/11/08/using-together-in-delphi/#comment-5432</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2005/11/08/using-together-in-delphi/#comment-5432</guid>
		<description>&#62; If you change the code, the diagram doesn't refresh right away – looks like LiveSource isn't really live&lt;br&gt;I wouldn't think we'd want it to be dragging &lt;br&gt;down the CPU all the time.  It only needs to&lt;br&gt;update when I want to look at it.  In my mind,&lt;br&gt;it is &#34;live&#34; in the sense that I don't need to do anything to keep them in sync.  &#34;Live&#34; as opposed to dead.  I see it as the perfect balance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; If you change the code, the diagram doesn&#8217;t refresh right away – looks like LiveSource isn&#8217;t really live<br />
<br />I wouldn&#8217;t think we&#8217;d want it to be dragging<br />
<br />down the CPU all the time.  It only needs to<br />
<br />update when I want to look at it.  In my mind,<br />
<br />it is &quot;live&quot; in the sense that I don&#8217;t need to do anything to keep them in sync.  &quot;Live&quot; as opposed to dead.  I see it as the perfect balance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
