<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Diamondback: My first attempt to compile real code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/</link>
	<description>Life, .NET, and Cats</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4276</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 21:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4276</guid>
		<description>Not a problem with rollback at all; I never got errors on the virtual hard drive, whether I was rolling back or not. The problem is with their shared folders.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a problem with rollback at all; I never got errors on the virtual hard drive, whether I was rolling back or not. The problem is with their shared folders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4275</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2004 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4275</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a problem with Virtual PC and the &#34;roll back&#34; facility.  VMWare's snapshots are very efficient.  I've actually noticed that Virtual PC appears to be slower with it's own implementation of this.  Personally, I wouldn't use Virtual PC for anything serious.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a problem with Virtual PC and the &quot;roll back&quot; facility.  VMWare&#8217;s snapshots are very efficient.  I&#8217;ve actually noticed that Virtual PC appears to be slower with it&#8217;s own implementation of this.  Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t use Virtual PC for anything serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe White's Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4277</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4277</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Diamondback: Method 'VirtualPC.CommitSomeStuffAndRollOtherStuffBack' not found&lt;/strong&gt;


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Diamondback: Method &#8216;VirtualPC.CommitSomeStuffAndRollOtherStuffBack&#8217; not found</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe White</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>True that; I probably shouldn't have compared the speeds. What I actually intended to say was that there was a precedent for this weird delay thing. (And it's obnoxious in Delphi 6, too!)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But here's the thing: when I first installed Diamondback inside the VM, it did not have this speed problem. The weird delays started showing up gradually, as I compiled more and more packages, and got worse as time went on. And when I created a fresh VM and reinstalled Diamondback, it was back to being fast.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True that; I probably shouldn&#8217;t have compared the speeds. What I actually intended to say was that there was a precedent for this weird delay thing. (And it&#8217;s obnoxious in Delphi 6, too!)</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the thing: when I first installed Diamondback inside the VM, it did not have this speed problem. The weird delays started showing up gradually, as I compiled more and more packages, and got worse as time went on. And when I created a fresh VM and reinstalled Diamondback, it was back to being fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4273</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/28/diamondback-my-first-attempt-to-compile-real-code/#comment-4273</guid>
		<description>Have you used any version of Delphi in a virtual machine before?  I wondered about this when you compared the performance of Delphi 6 (15 seconds) to Diamondback's 2 minutes.  IMO, it isn't a good idea to compare performance in a VM to the performance on a native host.  I've noticed that some apps are noticeably slower under a VM while others seem to run as if they were running directly on the host.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cheers,&lt;br&gt;Kevin.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you used any version of Delphi in a virtual machine before?  I wondered about this when you compared the performance of Delphi 6 (15 seconds) to Diamondback&#8217;s 2 minutes.  IMO, it isn&#8217;t a good idea to compare performance in a VM to the performance on a native host.  I&#8217;ve noticed that some apps are noticeably slower under a VM while others seem to run as if they were running directly on the host.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
<br />Kevin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
