Comments on: John Kaster’s Diamondback talk http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/ Life, .NET, and Cats Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:03:04 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Joe White's Blog http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4237 Joe White's Blog Tue, 26 Oct 2004 22:34:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4237 <strong>WatchCat</strong> WatchCat

]]> By: xluke http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4236 xluke Tue, 14 Sep 2004 23:17:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4236 <strong>John Kaster's Diamondback Talk</strong> Ping Back??:blog.csdn.net John Kaster’s Diamondback Talk

Ping Back??:blog.csdn.net

]]> By: Joe White http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4228 Joe White Tue, 14 Sep 2004 16:05:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4228 The nearest equivalent in WinForms is the Component. You can create all of those you want. <br> <br>The only real difference is, Components don't have global instances like TDataSets do. So if you use those global TDataModule references (e.g., if you're using the designer to hook controls on your form to a dataset in the data module), you'll have to do that in code. <br> <br>But if you follow good OO coding practices and create datamodules when you need them (instead of using the global reference), you can use Components as a replacement for TDataModule. The nearest equivalent in WinForms is the Component. You can create all of those you want.

The only real difference is, Components don’t have global instances like TDataSets do. So if you use those global TDataModule references (e.g., if you’re using the designer to hook controls on your form to a dataset in the data module), you’ll have to do that in code.

But if you follow good OO coding practices and create datamodules when you need them (instead of using the global reference), you can use Components as a replacement for TDataModule.

]]> By: Kurt http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4227 Kurt Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:48:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4227 It has, but there is non with WinForms.... It has, but there is non with WinForms….

]]> By: Joe White http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4234 Joe White Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:49:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4234 Hallvard: I'm just reporting what came up in the session. No offense to Danny was intended, I'm sure. :-P <br> <br>Kurt: Haven't heard anything about that. (I didn't even know there was a problem on this. Does VCL for .NET not have a TDataModule?) Hallvard: I’m just reporting what came up in the session. No offense to Danny was intended, I’m sure. :-P

Kurt: Haven’t heard anything about that. (I didn’t even know there was a problem on this. Does VCL for .NET not have a TDataModule?)

]]> By: Kurt http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4233 Kurt Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:14:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4233 Any news on the datamodule? Will there be a .net datamodule i Diamondback? Any news on the datamodule? Will there be a .net datamodule i Diamondback?

]]> By: Hallvard Vassbotn http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4232 Hallvard Vassbotn Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:35:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4232 > Doesn't go through the compiler, so it's very fast <br> <br>Ouch, better hope Danny won't catch you... ;) > Doesn’t go through the compiler, so it’s very fast

Ouch, better hope Danny won’t catch you… ;)

]]> By: Joe White http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4231 Joe White Sun, 12 Sep 2004 21:28:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4231 True, but keep in mind that Danny mentioned there'd be another release in the Whidbey timeframe. We can hold out hope of a few of those making it into that release. True, but keep in mind that Danny mentioned there’d be another release in the Whidbey timeframe. We can hold out hope of a few of those making it into that release.

]]> By: Max http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4230 Max Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:02:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4230 -Not in Diamondback/Win32 (but maybe in future Win32 compilers): <br> <br> * Nested types <br> * Records with methods <br> * Operator overloading <br> * Custom attributes <br> * Generics <br> * Multicast events <br> <br>Bad to hear that :-(((( <br>Especially "Operator overloading" and "Generics". -Not in Diamondback/Win32 (but maybe in future Win32 compilers):

* Nested types

* Records with methods

* Operator overloading

* Custom attributes

* Generics

* Multicast events

Bad to hear that :-((((

Especially "Operator overloading" and "Generics".

]]> By: Nick's Delphi Blog http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4235 Nick's Delphi Blog Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:45:00 +0000 http://blog.excastle.com/2004/09/12/john-kasters-diamondback-talk/#comment-4235 <strong>Sunday at Borcon</strong> Sunday at Borcon

]]>